I think cinematographic creation in digital era is infinite? think again: if I multiply the number of pixels on a screen with the number of colors it supports and with the number of frames in 1h 1/2 I will get a big number, true, but a FINITE one. and then great part of the resulting combinations are just abstract art, and another (smaller) part are movies already done. does that mean that there aren't so many movies left to be done in the digital era? anyhow, an important advantage of such a random movie making is that one needs no real actors, no real set, no real locations. just a damn fast machine. who wants to create the first frame ex-nihilo ?